The 2018 general elections presented a conundrum to a
democrat like me. Yes, most of you, my readers, know perfectly well which
coalition I voted for. But it was not as simple as it appeared.
I voted for Pakatan Harapan not because I truly believe in the
coalition’s democratic potential. In fact, I was one of those people who truly
hated their populist manifesto, and just by going through it, I knew they had
no confidence of winning the election. More importantly, I entertained the idea of not voting because I didn’t want to re-elect a former prime minister who had had his chance.
Although I joined in the chorus of “Malaysia Baharu”,
privately, to those closest to me, I expressed my doubt. How “baharu” can
Malaysia be if we just elected a leader from “zaman lama”? For me, I see it
clear as day. There was no “Malaysia Baharu”. At the very least, I laughed at
the irony of “Malaysia Baharu” being helmed by a former prime minister who had led
the government for 22 years in the 80s, 90s, and early 2000s. That seems like eons
ago, now.
There were two things that made me doubt the coalition,
especially with the addition of Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia. Firstly, like I
expressed to those closest to me, I have doubted the intention of those who
formed and joined Bersatu. For the simple reason that if they truly believed in
the reformasi movement, why didn’t they join one of the other parties
already available?
Maybe I’m naïve. I do understand the political motivation
behind the creation of Bersatu. None of the other then-opposition parties had the
support of the rural Malay voters, and it is impossible to win the election
without the support of this group of electorates. But on an individual basis, why
didn’t these new Bersatu members—except for former UMNO members—joined PKR or
DAP or Amanah before GE-14? Did they join Bersatu simply to gain political
power or to fight for justice and equality as done by PKR and DAP for decades
prior?
My second grouse is the role of Mahathir. Yes, again, I
understand the political calculation of bringing him on board. His leadership
definitely brought success to Pakatan Harapan in a way that has evaded Anwar
Ibrahim for decades. Tun has the trust of the Malays. It just seems that everyone
has suddenly forgotten the allegation of nepotism and cronyism during his first
tenure as prime minister. I know that kleptocracy is the ‘in’ word these days,
but there were other words filling the alternative media in the first decade of
the 21st century. Sometimes I think it is true that “Melayu mudah
lupa”. People say give him a chance, as people do have the ability to change
for the better. Maybe I’m just a pessimist. I’m not sure how much someone in his 90s can change when he has lived the previous nine decades a certain
way.
Just to be clear, I’m talking specifically about his political
ideology. I am refraining from using the word authoritarian or
dictatorship. Like Tun himself said, he would be the only “dictator” to resign.
He is a politician. But is he a democratic politician? In the literature, we
know there is a difference between a change in political behaviour and one of
political ideology. The former simply means he has changed his outward conduct
to appear more democratic. For example, choosing to form a new party to compete
against the party that gave him a platform many years ago. Yet, it is very
difficult to ascertain if a person has changed his or her political ideology to
become more democratic because that is more entrenched. At the end of the day, it
is our ideology that directs our behaviour.
People also say that if Anwar can forgive him, so should the
rest of the country. This is when I had to check myself from giving my rude
eye-roll. Anwar is a politician himself! Of course, he has forgiven Tun, because
he knows without Tun’s support, he will never be the next prime minister. Anwar is a calculative politician himself, and that
is how he has survived until today. God knows, maybe he has sincerely forgiven
Tun, and I do hope so. But that is not reason enough to put someone in the
highest office in government.
Why do I sound so bitter? Because I can see my prediction
slowly unfolds itself right now. I’ve always had respect for Tun, even
post-1998, but not for any democratic credentials he may have, but for his
statesmanship. No one can deny Tun is a great statesman. Without him, who knows
what Malaysia would look like today. When I was in the LSE, I only needed to say “Malaysia”
and my classmates would say “Mahathir”. That is how synonymous he is with this
nation.
Since he is such a great statesman and politician, I know
that nothing happened in the country without his astute calculation. I am
starting to question everything. From his “equal” distribution of ministerial
positions, to his appointment of first-term MPs as ministers, to his acceptance
of former UMNO members to join Bersatu, and to his CALL for more UMNO members
to join Bersatu. When you say that the Malays are weak, you are implying that
the non-Malays are gaining strength. This, in my opinion, is a very smart move
to gain the attention of the Malays. For that, I am in awe of Tun as a strategist.
Maybe I am too invested in the reformasi movement that I cannot fathom
why we would want to sleep in the same bed with our ideological nemesis? In the
name of democracy, let there be healthy opposition.
So why did I vote for Harapan? Because like I always tell my
students, politics is about choosing the lesser of evils. I’m not saying that
all politicians are evil, but I believe in the saying “power corrupts, and absolute
power corrupts absolutely”. These politicians are in the game to gain power.
Nothing morally wrong with that! We need people who are ambitious to run the
government. But as mindful citizens, we need to always be on guard. Barisan
Nasional or Pakatan Harapan, both have their flaws. But “tepuk dada” and ask
yourself, which coalition would do less damage to the country. Some of my
students answered PAS. Fine.
What would happen in GE-15? At this point, no one knows. But
if the country decides to vote Barisan Nasional back into power, I have no
problem with that. See, I’m a democrat. I believe in the democratic process to
choose our government. Democracy is a process; it is not the outcome. I support
the people’s right to vote in a free and fair election. That is all I have ever
wanted. For as long as I can remember, Malaysia has never had a free and fair
election. 2018 was NOT a year where we had free and fair elections. Yet,
Harapan was able to dethrone Barisan Nasional. I tear up every time because
it reminds me of the “people’s power”.
If the people decide Harapan is a one-term government, so be
it. Japan had the same experience and so did Mexico. The important lesson is
that as a nation, we have proven to the world that we were able to change
administration peacefully, and thus the people shall not worry if one day we
decide to change administration again. It can be done, and it can be done
without blood being shed. That is the victory.